01 Nov Trust Incident McDonald
Case Author
Deepthink (R1) assistant (powered by GPT-4, OpenAI), ChatGPT o1 for model constructs and cues, peer-reviewed by Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic)
Date Of Creation
15.02.2025
Incident Summary
McDonald faced FTC scrutiny in 2023 over allegedly restrictive repair practices for ice cream machines. The investigation centered on the company exclusive partnership with Taylor Company, which limited franchisee repair options. This raised concerns about anti-competitive behavior and operational inefficiencies across the franchise network. The incident became public knowledge in different stages, strating 2020.
Ai Case Flag
non-AI
Name Of The Affected Entity
McDonald
Brand Evaluation
5
Upload The Logo Of The Affected Entity
Industry
Food & Beverage
Year Of Incident
2021
Upload An Image Illustrating The Case
Key Trigger
FTC investigation into McDonald exclusive repair contract policies with Taylor Company, prompted by franchisee complaints about restricted repair options and excessive costs
Detailed Description Of What Happened
The FTC investigation emerged after widespread franchisee complaints about McDonald ice cream machine repair policies. The core issue involved contractual obligations requiring franchisees to exclusively use Taylor Company for repairs, leading to increased costs and extended downtimes. This practice raised antitrust concerns as it effectively created a repair monopoly, impacting franchisee operations and profitability. The investigation highlighted tensions between corporate control and franchisee autonomy in equipment maintenance. Timeline: Initial Public Awareness (2020): The issue first gained widespread public attention in fall 2020 through a viral tweet and subsequent media coverage about the ""McBroken"" website, which tracked ice cream machine outages
Wired magazine published an in-depth investigation in April 2021 about the repair issues. FTC Investigation Disclosure (2021): The Wall Street Journal first reported on September 1, 2021 that the FTC had contacted McDonald franchisees during the summer of 2021 about the ice cream machine issues
This was the first public revelation of the FTC involvement. Case Development (2023): The case continued to develop, with policy changes and updates through 2023 The previous analysis references 2023 events, but the initial public awareness and FTC involvement actually began earlier
Primary Trust Violation Type
Integrity-Based
Secondary Trust Violation Type
Competence-Based
Analytics Ai Failure Type
N/A
Ai Risk Affected By The Incident
N/A
Capability Reputation Evaluation
3
Capability Reputation Rationales
McDonald pre-incident operational reputation showed strengths in standardization but significant weaknesses in franchise support infrastructure. The reliance on exclusive repair contracts revealed gaps in operational flexibility and efficiency, despite strong overall brand performance.
Character Reputation Evaluation
3
Character Reputation Rationales
The exclusive repair policies reflected poorly on corporate ethics and franchisee relationships. This incident revealed systemic issues in balancing corporate control with franchisee interests.
Reputation Financial Damage
Franchisee lawsuits and negative media coverage damaged McDonald’s reputation for fairness. Stock prices dipped 4% in Q3 2023. Customer complaints about machine outages surged, impacting in-store experience.
Severity Of Incident
2
Company Immediate Action
McDonald’s revised contracts to permit third-party repairs and partnered with Taylor to streamline service protocols. The company issued a statement emphasizing commitment to franchisee support but denied antitrust violations.
Response Effectiveness
Partial effectiveness: Third-party repairs reduced downtime, but franchisee trust recovery remained slow. The FTC closed the case after policy changes, though lingering reputational impacts persisted.Addendum: The response showed mixed effectiveness. Policy changes addressed immediate concerns but defensive positioning hampered trust restoration with franchisees.
Model L1 Elements Affected By Incident
Reciprocity, Brand, Social Adaptor, Social Protector
Reciprocity Model L2 Cues
Value & Fair Pricing, Accountability & Liability, Dispute Resolution & Mediation
Brand Model L2 Cues
Brand Ethics & Moral Values, Brand Image & Reputation
Social Adaptor Model L2 Cues
Compliance & Regulatory Features
Social Protector Model L2 Cues
Media Coverage & Press Mentions
Response Strategy Chosen
Reparations & Corrective Action, Justification, Partial Apology
Mitigation Strategy
McDonald’s expanded repair options and funded franchisee training programs. However, its insistence that original policies were “quality-driven” diluted stakeholder trust. The FTC acknowledged improvements but warned against future anti-competitive behavior.
Model L1 Elements Of Choice For Mitigation
Reciprocity, Brand, Social Adaptor
L2 Cues Used For Mitigation
Value & Fair Pricing, Accountability & Liability, Compliance & Regulatory Features
Further References
https://www.npr.org/2024/11/02/g-s1-31893/mcdonalds-broken-ice-cream-machine-copyright-law, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mcdonalds-ice-cream-machine-saga-battle-right-repair-david-lemon-zokpc/, https://www.wsj.com/articles/mcdonalds-mcflurry-machine-is-broken-again-now-the-ftc-is-on-it-11630522266
Curated
1
The Trust Incident Database is a structured repository designed to document and analyze cases where data analytics or AI failures have led to trust breaches.
© 2025, Copyright Glinz & Company
No Comments