Trust Incident Volkswagen

Trust Incident Volkswagen



Case Author


Perplexity AI, V. February 2025, Perplexity, ChatGPT o1 for model constructs and cues, peer reviewed by DeepThink R1, DeepSeek.



Date Of Creation


13.02.2025



Incident Summary


Dieselgate: Volkswagen was found to have installed ""defeat devices"" in diesel engines to cheat emissions tests, affecting millions of vehicles worldwide and severely damaging the company reputation and finances. Addendum: Include health/environmental impacts: ""The deception caused vehicles to emit up to 40x more NOx pollutants, linked to respiratory illnesses and environmental harm. Global legal penalties exceeded $30 billion.""



Ai Case Flag


non-AI



Name Of The Affected Entity


Volkswagen



Brand Evaluation


5



Industry


Automotive Industry



Year Of Incident


2015



Key Trigger


Discovery of emissions cheating software by US regulators



Detailed Description Of What Happened


In September 2015, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that Volkswagen had intentionally programmed turbocharged direct injection (TDI) diesel engines to activate emission controls only during laboratory emissions testing. This software, known as a ""defeat device,"" caused the vehicles to meet US standards during regulatory testing but emit up to 40 times more NOx in real-world driving. The programming caused the vehicles to emit different levels of pollutants in real-world driving compared to testing conditions. Volkswagen deployed this software in about 11 million cars worldwide, including 500,000 in the United States, for model years 2009 through 2015.



Primary Trust Violation Type


Integrity-Based



Secondary Trust Violation Type


Benevolence-Based



Analytics Ai Failure Type


N/A



Ai Risk Affected By The Incident


N/A



Capability Reputation Evaluation


5



Capability Reputation Rationales


Prior to the emissions scandal, Volkswagen had an exceptional reputation for engineering excellence and innovation. The company was known for producing high-quality, reliable vehicles across various market segments. VW capability reputation was built on decades of automotive innovation, strong sales performance globally, and a diverse portfolio of brands including Audi, Porsche, and Bentley. Their technical competence was evident in their advanced diesel engine technology, which was perceived as both powerful and fuel-efficient. The company operational reliability was reflected in strong customer loyalty and consistent market share growth. VW was also recognized for its manufacturing prowess and efficiency, setting industry benchmarks in production techniques. Addendum: Highlight pre-scandal market leadership: ""VW was the world’s largest automaker by sales in 2015, with advanced TDI engines marketed as eco-friendly innovations.""



Character Reputation Evaluation


4



Character Reputation Rationales


Before the scandal, Volkswagen enjoyed a strong ethical reputation built on German engineering values and corporate responsibility. The company was perceived as transparent in its operations and committed to environmental sustainability, particularly through its promotion of ""clean diesel"" technology. VW demonstrated benevolence through various corporate social responsibility initiatives and maintained positive relationships with stakeholders, including employees and local communities where it operated. The brand long history contributed to a perception of stability and traditional values. VW was also known for its adherence to stringent European environmental standards, which further bolstered its ethical image. However, some concerns existed about the company corporate governance structure and the influence of its major shareholders. Addendum: Note contradictions: ""VW’s clean diesel marketing masked the fraud, indicating pre-existing transparency gaps in environmental claims.""



Reputation Financial Damage


Reputation and/or financial damage: The emissions scandal caused severe damage to Volkswagen reputation and finances. The company stock price plummeted by about 30% in the days following the revelation. VW faced billions of euros in fines, penalties, and compensation payments. The scandal eroded consumer trust, particularly in key markets like the US and Europe, leading to a significant drop in sales of diesel vehicles. VW brand value decreased substantially, and the company faced numerous lawsuits from consumers, shareholders, and governments. The incident also sparked broader scrutiny of the automotive industry emissions testing practices and accelerated the shift towards electric vehicles. Addendum: Quantify fines: ""Total penalties reached 33.3 billiong lobally, including 14.7 billion in U.S. settlements. Stock dropped 37% in one week (Sept 2015).""



Severity Of Incident


5



Company Immediate Action


Volkswagen initially denied the allegations but quickly admitted to the wrongdoing when presented with evidence. The company issued a public apology, initiated an internal investigation, and suspended several top executives. They also announced a recall of affected vehicles and committed to cooperating with regulatory authorities. Addendum: Specify leadership changes: ""CEO Martin Winterkorn resigned, and nine executives were suspended.



Response Effectiveness


The initial response was largely ineffective. The company attempt to deny the allegations before admitting fault damaged credibility. The subsequent actions, including leadership changes and commitments to rectify the issue, were seen as necessary but insufficient given the scale of the deception. The effectiveness was limited by the perception that VW acted only when caught, rather than proactively addressing the issue.



Model L1 Elements Affected By Incident


Reciprocity, Brand, Social Adaptor, Social Protector



Reciprocity Model L2 Cues


Transparency & Explainability, Accountability & Liability



Brand Model L2 Cues


Brand Ethics & Moral Values, Brand Image & Reputation



Social Adaptor Model L2 Cues


Compliance & Regulatory Features



Social Protector Model L2 Cues


Media Coverage & Press Mentions



Response Strategy Chosen


Apology, Reparations & Corrective Action



Mitigation Strategy


Volkswagen adopted a multi-faceted response strategy combining apology with reparations and corrective action. After initial denials, the company issued public apologies acknowledging the wrongdoing and expressing regret for betraying customer trust. VW took responsibility for the incident and committed to transparency throughout the investigation process. As part of their reparations, they offered compensation to affected customers and initiated a massive recall program. The corrective action involved leadership changes, restructuring of the company governance, and a shift in corporate strategy towards electric vehicles. This strategy aimed to demonstrate accountability, provide restitution to affected customers, and prevent future incidents through systemic improvements.



Model L1 Elements Of Choice For Mitigation


Reciprocity, Brand, Social Adaptor



L2 Cues Used For Mitigation


Transparency & Explainability, Accountability & Liability, Compliance & Regulatory Features



Further References


https://www.epa.gov/vw/learn-about-volkswagen-violations, https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/business/international/volkswagen-diesel-car-scandal.html



Curated


1




The Trust Incident Database is a structured repository designed to document and analyze cases where data analytics or AI failures have led to trust breaches.

© 2025, Copyright Glinz & Company



Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.